JV2017
Hey there,
I'm looking for a camera that will be used to record a "news show" for YouTube. Something that will be able to capture fairly high quality video of my face at a desk talking about stuff. And bear in mind, just because it's "for YouTube" doesn't mean I wanna cut corners on quality!
I've talked briefly with a photographer friend of mine, and he suggested that I looked into getting a dSLR. I found the Rebel T3i, but upon further research, it seemed like I'd be buying a device that's focused more on Photography than record clear, crisp HD video! Although I may be slightly interested in taking a few pictures now and again, I think it makes more sense to get a device made for recording HD video. I want something that's portable, but can also be mounted for use in my show.
Long story short, I want a device that can:
1. Record high quality HD video (1080p preferred, maybe 720p)
2. Be both portable and able to be mounted on a tripod
3. Around $500, preferably cheaper
Can anyone recommend a solid option for me? dSLR, Camcorder, HD Video Camera, whatever you think will suit my needs. I'd really appreciate it!
Thanks!
Answer
A dSLR is designed to capture still images. Capturing video (and audio) is a secondary "convenience feature". This is why most have known problems overheating when capturing video for long periods and have poor manual audio-gain control. This is not to say they cannot capture good video, they can - but using this secondary convenience feature requires the user to workaround these and other known issues. Along with this is the fact that they mostly capture video compressed video. More compression = reduced video quality.
A camcorder is designed to capture video and audio. For $500 or less, you are in the low-end of consumer camcorders. It will not have the overheating problems a dSLR in he same price range will have. It *should* have a mic jack and some sort of manual audio control. Pretty much all consumer camcorders in your price range will meet your requirements.
If the primary reason for the equipment is digital stills, then the dSLR is preferred. Video capture is an afterthought. If the primary reason for the equipment is video, then get a camcorder. There is no single device that can provide both functions (especially for a prolonged period) well.
If the goal is "best available video quality", then use the proper tool to meet the goal.
What we don't know:
Whether your budget includes a tripod or other steadying device.
Whether your budget includes a couple of mics (perhaps a shotgun and a wireless lavalier.
Whether your computer can deal with the captured video.
Whether the computer has a video editor that can deal with the captured video.
A dSLR is designed to capture still images. Capturing video (and audio) is a secondary "convenience feature". This is why most have known problems overheating when capturing video for long periods and have poor manual audio-gain control. This is not to say they cannot capture good video, they can - but using this secondary convenience feature requires the user to workaround these and other known issues. Along with this is the fact that they mostly capture video compressed video. More compression = reduced video quality.
A camcorder is designed to capture video and audio. For $500 or less, you are in the low-end of consumer camcorders. It will not have the overheating problems a dSLR in he same price range will have. It *should* have a mic jack and some sort of manual audio control. Pretty much all consumer camcorders in your price range will meet your requirements.
If the primary reason for the equipment is digital stills, then the dSLR is preferred. Video capture is an afterthought. If the primary reason for the equipment is video, then get a camcorder. There is no single device that can provide both functions (especially for a prolonged period) well.
If the goal is "best available video quality", then use the proper tool to meet the goal.
What we don't know:
Whether your budget includes a tripod or other steadying device.
Whether your budget includes a couple of mics (perhaps a shotgun and a wireless lavalier.
Whether your computer can deal with the captured video.
Whether the computer has a video editor that can deal with the captured video.
any suggestions about a portable video camera?
Just Churc
looking for suggestions for a good purchase for my non-profit. thanks for your help.
Answer
HD Camcorders. You would have to spend $3500 on a HD camcorder to better video quality than a $350 MiniDV tape camcorders videos are. If a lot of high movement (sports, etc) are to shot, then do not get a consumer level HD camcorder as under those conditions, they take terrible video.
The Canon ZR 960 can be had for about $350. It has a Mic jack, can be mounted on a tripod, has many settings, uses MiniDV tape as a storage media.
You computer will need a firewire port in it for video transfer, you cannot hook this camera to a USB port. http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/campaigns/campaigntemplate.asp?CampaignID=233&srkey=firewire
HD Camcorders. You would have to spend $3500 on a HD camcorder to better video quality than a $350 MiniDV tape camcorders videos are. If a lot of high movement (sports, etc) are to shot, then do not get a consumer level HD camcorder as under those conditions, they take terrible video.
The Canon ZR 960 can be had for about $350. It has a Mic jack, can be mounted on a tripod, has many settings, uses MiniDV tape as a storage media.
You computer will need a firewire port in it for video transfer, you cannot hook this camera to a USB port. http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/campaigns/campaigntemplate.asp?CampaignID=233&srkey=firewire
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
