Tampilkan postingan dengan label portable hard drive vs desktop. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label portable hard drive vs desktop. Tampilkan semua postingan

Minggu, 08 Juni 2014

Help! Question about External vs Portable hard drive?




Its Me


I'm about to go to Staples and I desperately need the Anwers! community's help! I'm pretty knowledgable about software and internet stuff, but I'm totally dumb when it comes to hardware, so I need you to help me pick the best item for my needs. Here's my situation.

My computer: Dell Optiplex 755 PC with 74.4 GB harddrive and Windows XP.

I don't have (and don't want) a lap top, so the only way to move files from place to place is with a flash drive (I have a 16GB). I live half the year in one state and then the other half of the year in another state. I have a monitor at both places, so I have to take my harddrive tower back and forth with me. I also have my computer cram packed with photos and video (I'm a photographer/videographer) and though I back up everything on discs, I HATE having to go through all of those discs to find anything. I want to be able to keep a copy of all of that stuff on my computer for easy access, and to able to easily transport it all.

SO..... there are three things on sale at Staples that I believe might help and I need you guys to choose the BEST one for me (these are the only options so please don't recommend "better" things):


IOMEGA PRESTIGE 1TB External Hard Drive
[This has a very sleek and small casing - easy to move]

SEAGATE GOFLEX 500GB Portable Hard Drive

IOMEGA EGO 320GB Portable Hard Drive

Prices are irrellivant to me.

So, I know the 1TB is great, but it is an external hard drive... vs. the PORTABLE 500GB and 320GB hard drives. Is it better for me to have a portable or external?

OK... and second question.... do I just plug these in to my main hard drive tower with a USB or something? I mean, maybe the issue over external vs. portable is irrellivant if they are both easy-plug-in by USB because the external unit is easily portable. But I don't know about these things. Does the external unit have to internally wired into my main harddrive?

I'm so confused I do not know what to do..... and we are leaving in 25 minutes to go to Staples so it's now or never.


THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP!!!!!
Just to reinterate...
I have a DESK TOP - not a LAP TOP.



Answer
The portable is just smaller in size, with less capacity.

The external is often used for people with desktops whose computers don't really move. You can use them with laptops though.

Both accomplish the same thing though. And yes you attach them via USB.


That said, my vote is for the Seagate 500gb Portable HDD based on what I know of Seagate and its reputation.

reliability? Thumb Drive VS. External Hard Drive.?

Q. thumb drive is a san disk cruzer 16 and 32 GB external hard drive is not a desktop it is a portable seagate 500 GB and 1 TB


Answer
I would suggest External Hard Drive.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Selasa, 29 April 2014

reliability? Thumb Drive VS. External Hard Drive.?

Q. thumb drive is a san disk cruzer 16 and 32 GB external hard drive is not a desktop it is a portable seagate 500 GB and 1 TB


Answer
I would suggest External Hard Drive.

external hard drives.....rpm speed vs bus speed?




bastian915


wanting to get an external hard drive for my laptop....looking at different manufactures and wondering if at a fairly good bus speed like in the Firewire 400 connection if there really would be much difference between 5400rpm and 7200rpm. I'm just wondering because the portable bus powered hard drives seem to come with 5400rpm and the desktop versions can go a bit faster.
Hey wizard of OZ thanks for the post....wondering if it would then be worthwhile (since the laptop only has firewire 400) to get a firewire 800 express card for the faster bus speed.



Answer
To start with the drives in external hard drives are the same as you have in a desktop. The difference between 5400rpm and 7200rpm is that the faster you turn the disk platters the faster you get to the data and reduce something called rotational delay which can be most the the time to retrieve data from a drive or write to it. The reason the bus powered drives are slower is that the slower drives take less power. Any external drive is going to be slower than an internal drive because even Firewire is not as fast as an internal bus connnection.
Bottom line it probably does not matter which you get because you should only be using an external drive for backup or moving data via sneaker net. I would suggest that the faster bus is your best bet though.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Sabtu, 18 Januari 2014

Graphic design student...What are some lap top recommendations?

portable hard drive vs desktop on Art Old Versus New: or more hard disk drives
portable hard drive vs desktop image



San Jose M


I have a desktop computer with dual monitors that I share with my husband. It works great, is super fast, and is just right for school stuff.
However, I want a lap top that can handle Photoshop as well as some other design programs.

My current laptop is at least 8 years old and is on its last leg. I can't watch videos, scroll through pictures or do multiple tasks at once on it. Those are all things I'd like with a new laptop.

What would you recommend? What do you use?



Answer
Hey San Jose Mommy. I'm a San Jose Grandpa!

I have seen this "graphic design laptop" question many times on Yahoo Answers, and I consistantly respond that there ARE no good laptops for this purposes. Mainly, it is an issue with the size of the monitor, which makes good design paifully difficult. Unless you are designing a final product that is smaller than your monitor, it is hard to work to such a small surface. It is true, that not all graphic design projects are even as small as the largest monitor, but it is simply human nature to do artwork on as large a surface as possible.

All right. Having said this, and, with the recognition that many people, particulary design students, don't really have the option of running both a desktop design station, AND having to carry a laptop for school, the only advice I can offer is that you make sure that the portable system has the most ram, fastest processor and largest hard drive you can afford. Graphics apps keep growing and get more resource hungry with every upgrade. So, get as much raw power as you can, now, to minimize the chance of going obsolete too soon.

Stick with the name brands and, run the same platform as the system at home. I won't get into the Mac vs. PC argument, except to say that I run both types in my studio. THEY WORK THE SAME! But, keep your desktop and your laptop using the same, basic platform. It will make sharing files and peripherals much easier.

Stick with the name brands.

P.S. I don't use a laptop exept for journaling while on road trips and to store photos when my flash cards get full.

Is it going to cool of much more this next week? I like warm weather, but I'm looking forward to the autumn colors.

what should i buy a mac desktop or macbook?




SUNNY572


my bro has a macbook and lets me use it but i dont know what to get and what are the differences of use


Answer
As the others have said, a laptop is used if you need it to be portable and a desktop if it will always be in the same place. Remember that you have to pay extra for portability. IE: MacBook costs much more than a comparably equipped desktop, or for the same money, you can buy a better equipped iMac vs MacBook.

I don't even consider the Mini. It is a very good computer, but the added costs for quality extras like monitor, etc. drive the price way up. You spend about the same as for an iMac, but with specifications closer to those of a MacBook.

Either would include a SuperDrive, Bluetooth, Wireless networking (Airport, which is compatible with the other wireless manufacturer's products), ethernet, USB, Firewire, etc.as standard equipment.

As an example: Let's say you have a $2000 budget.

You can get a MacBook Pro with a 2.66 ghz duo core processor, 4 gig of Ram, a 15" screen, a 360 gig @ 5400 rpm hard drive and a 256 meg video card. Upgrading the RAM to its maximum of 8 gig would add $600.

OR

You can get an iMac with a 2.66 ghz quad core processor, 4 gig of RAM, a 27" screen, a 1 tb @ 7200 rpm hard drive, and a 512 meg video card. Upgrading the RAM to 8 gig would add $ 200. It has a maximum of 16 gig, but that upgrade is $1400. I recommend the 8 gig as it will do anything you'd need for now and later buy the 16 gig from an after market source.
( http://www.ramseeker.com/ lists RAM prices for all models from numerous companies.)

That works out that the iMac has a faster CPU (quad vs duo core), same basic RAM, (but cheaper to upgrade) 27" vs 15" screen, 3 times as much hard drive space and double the VRAM for the same price. The advantage of the MacBook is it is portable.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Senin, 23 Desember 2013

What features should I look for when buying a new laptop computer?

portable hard drive vs desktop on Toshiba Canvio Portable Hard Drives 500 GB vs Western Digital My ...
portable hard drive vs desktop image



poolhallju


The main things I will be doing are:

homework on Microsoft Office programs,

using the internet to download music from iTunes and burning to disc,

and uploading pictures from my camera for temporary storage on the desktop.

I don't really understand the difference between the types of memories and the capabilities they provide. Different processors? CD R and DVD R vs. CD RW and DVD RW--what is this?? If you have a suggestion on what computer to consider, please include that in your answer. **I will not be considering Apple because of my previous experience with the brand.

Thank you, yahoo-ers!



Answer
*smiles at Apple reference*
when I was looking around before buying this laptop, i did wander into an apple store out of curiosity

walked out again about five minutes later and didn't seriously consider an ibook in any of my further reckoning :-)

For the uses you've specified, you'd be as well to buy second hand if money is an issue - anything you can get these days --- for all of Intel's hard sell TV adverts --- is about 3 or 4 times more powerful than you really need for any of that. But, if you can afford it, you may as well get a nicely specified machine; unlike getting a 4x more powerful car, you won't be spending a fortune on fuel or insurance, or suffering from cripplingly heavy handling or go deaf. A well made modern machine will burn up no more, or possibly less power than a much, much slower one from a few years ago, and weigh less / be quieter too.

First question - what are your priorities re: portability vs capability? Will you be carrying it around a lot all day, doing a lot of work off the battery and mainly with lightweight files kept on the hard disc, or will it be mostly sat at home on a desk, plugged in, doing a fair bit of media work, playing DVDs etc? That's the main tradeoff these days, as there's an awful lot of choice in terms of form-factor. Used to be that a laptop was a known quantity in terms of size - like two letter writing pads stacked on each other. Not any more.

Personally I went for the lightweight portable route, as I needed to do a fair bit of wordprocessing and other office stuff on the road (well, the train, and around all manner of random places) and needed something a bit thinner, but no more spread out than that old 2-pad electronic jalopy (£40, used, with a good battery - bargain!) I'd been using before, as my arms were tired but the available work spaces were tight as rubber gloves on wet hands. A modern thin-bordered 12" screen offers a lot more working area (almost to the level of a once-common 14" tube monitor) than an older laptop, in the same size case - it's easily enough for me, and has the same resolution (same conceptual desktop space for windows etc) as my mother's heavier 14". Besides, if you're typing, you're only looking at a tiny, tiny part of it at a time; the old one had about half the pixel resolution of this and was still OK for writing lengthy reports!

I've sacrificed a bit of potential screen area, a bit of hard drive space and CPU speed, one speaker (internal mono's not an issue if you rarely use it without (stereo) headphones) and an internal DVD drive in order to get something sleek and lightweight with a phenomenal battery runtime without paying over the odds; but with a little research and in-store testing, made sure the actual performance wasn't suffering much (quick HD even if "small", large and fast memory, current-generation albeit lower speed CPU, good graphics chip, good solid typist's keyboard, standard width screen to maximise the "useful" WP space). Plus it's a tablet PC... I can sign my name in documents, or flip it over and hold it like an actual paper pad and use the pen as a mouse... and as I waited for the easter sales, I got a cracking bundle deal with an (nice, but very bulky and therefore stay-at-home) external dual layer DVD writer, TV tuner card, etc.

Alternatively, you may want to watch DVDs or not have brilliant sight, and particularly burn a lot of discs... an internal drive and a large screen will be particular boons here, and you'll likely get an even better keyboard into the bargain, with massive battery life or pen functions being minor concerns. They can go all the way up to 17" widescreen, with high quality integrated speakers etc, and what is more or less a full sized desktop keyboard attached --- becoming basically portable desktop PCs, in the same way that a 14" TV with a pop-out handle at the top is "portable"... when you fold it up, you're still carrying a 17" screen, speakers, and large keyboard with a high performance computer cleverly tucked away inside them.

So my personal reccos on hardware - there's some common and some different elements "depending":

Small and light:
* No, or basic & very thin integrated optical drive (a lot of it's tasks can be taken over by thumbdrives, mp3 players and wireless networking these days). However, you'll want to get an external drive as well to replace it - theyre still too useful to abandon. Almost anything will do, so long as its DVD Dual Layer.
* Current or immediately previous generation CPU and power-saving mobile chipset. I'd avoid AMD for now, as they're uncharacteristically lagging Intel, particularly in the mobile stakes. Go for a Core (probably solo, but try a duo if the stated battery life is good - it could potentially *extend* it for media apps) or Pentium-M processor with Speedstep (automatically adjusts chip speed vs power drain according to demand / battery), around 1.5 to 2.0ghz. Pentium-M with speeds that are multiples of 200mhz are older generation; those with multiples of 266 are nearly current and a better bet, providing good performance with frankly astounding efficiency. Make sure its based on the well-established Centrino power saving main chipset.
* 12" screen or thereabouts. You can get away with 11 or 13" (mainly Sonys), or even 14" with a clever manufacturer - there are even some 14" tablets, which implies they must be light enough to comfortably hold up in one hand! For the larger sizes, widescreen is a good idea - you dont get a great improvement in word processor or internet work space, but the machine will be a more easily handled shape (side to side room is far less often an issue than front-to-back), and you can tile windows to the left and right to view two slightly narrow ones at once. If you go down this route, try for 1280x800 resolution - it gives the best vertical breathing room, and is just dandy for both the screen size, and for viewing videos (including full screen high definition - 720p with just the very slightest letterboxing, as will be evident on a LOT of larger screens used for it)
* Memory is your friend, as it prevents slow, power draining disc accessing. 512mb as a minimum; anything less under XP can cause noticable, frustrating slowdown. 768mb or 1Gb is pretty good. It will almost certainly be DDR (double data rate), with the actual speed rating - i've found to my surprise when upgrade hunting recently - not seeming to currently make a great impact on performance, at least within the ultraportable laptop speed ranges. It should be matched to the motherboard/CPU speed by the manufacturer anyhow.
* A moderately sized hard disc should allow you to store a fair few mp3s and pics/vids... i'd say 40gb as a minimum, 60 or 80 is better. At least 5400rpm if at all possible; ditto Serial-ATA connection and a large disc cache (8mb) as these will help accelerate performance noticably. If its a small one you may want to be ruthless tracking down all of XP's bloat before you start saving a lot of media files - I cut the best part of TEN gigabytes off the disc by hunting & zapping all the piles of default-install multilanguage files (mainly tutorials that no one will ever watch)...
* Half decent graphics chip. You can't expect miracles at this end of the range, but something like an Intel 91x series (Im not an intel schill, honest) will give excellent 2D / video performance and acceptable 3D for non demanding tasks or games.
* Video out on the main machine (not via a Docking Station add-on) is a definite winner, as it lets you use bigger monitors or projectors where available, bypassing (or adding to) the small internal screen. TV out also a plus.
* Expansion card slot. Must have. Crippled without it, even given how many things use USB these days. Don't settle for slow USB or wireless network either - the high speed versions are cheap, single chip designs, and can easily fit in hand-held devices. A memory card reader is also handy, if you lose your camera cable (or it dies altogether) and its of a compatible type.
* Good mouse options - many have touchpad AND stick these days. If it's one or the other - TAKE THE PAD! Also see if you can get a wheel-type device integrated in the mouse buttons - i'm sorely missing that capability.
* Test the keyboard if at all possible... unlike a desktop, you likely cant change a nasty one. You don't want finger ache from a sloppy one, or confusion over exactly where otherwise normal keys (backslash, reverse quote, hash, enter, backspace...) are located.
* GOOD BATTERY LIFE. Tell anything offering less than 4 hours in battery-saver mode where to stick it. Fast charging is also nice... e.g. under two hours 0 to 100% when off / in saver mode.
* Light weight. We're talking 2.5lbs / 1.25kg or less here. That's considerably heavier than you think, when you have to carry it and hold it up.
* And if you can ... why not get a tablet PC? Just for bragging rights if nothing else. It may unleash a creative spark in you, even more so than a regular graphics tablet... Remember they have handwriting (unnervingly accurate) and speech recognition (of a sort) thrown in, if you can't hack using an onscreen keyboard.
Price: £800, special bundle offer (+ more for office, cd burner software)

Quasi desktop:
* You gotta take the core duo, somewhere around 2 - 2.5ghz. This thing will toast along but wont break the bank electricity wise (or chuck out a lot of heat and need overly noisy air cooling). Again try for intel, centrino, speedstep etc. In a few months you may want to reconsider AMD as theyre at least regaining ground in the high performance market.
* Oddly you can more get away with 512mb here as the cpu and HD will be quicker, and power isnt AS much of an issue. Still, 1Gb is better. DONT SETTLE FOR LESS THAN 512.
* Bigger hard disc is the order of the day. At least 80gb - that'll see you right for music and photographs for a good long time.
* Internal DVD writer. Dual layer if at all possible. Other than this distinction they're all much of a muchness. I don't know if there's an e.g. HD-DVD or BluRay drive that also offers writing capability right now...
* Larger screen! Almost certainly widescreen, and a minimum of 14". The maximum is up to you, as in how much you'll want to cart it about. 15" is a good compromise. Look for a good, high resolution, so that things don't look blocky and indistinct despite the large screen. 1024x768 at these sizes is sign of a manufacturer offloading out-of-date parts, as only sub-12" screens go lower than this anymore. 1280x800 widescreen is a minimum. 1280x960 / 1024 or 1400x1050 standard shape and 1440x900 widescreen are good starting points.
* Very good video "card" chipset - nVidia GeForce Mobile and the like. Not sure on the exact names :-) but slightly stripped-down versions of their desktop cards. Be careful of them robbing their working memory (sometimes excessive amounts of) directly from main RAM though; particularly if you're marginal for spare memory, this can push things over the edge into a hard disk-thrashing nightmare.
* Decent integrated soundsystem. Doesn't have to be booming, but at least stereo speakers that make a good attempt at delivering a little power across most of the audible frequency range.
* Decent set of integrated ports. As well as video and TV out, you may see a parallel (old printer) socket, alongside network, modem, several USB, maybe a firewire, possibly a multi-card reader and video INput, plus headphone/external speaker, microphone and line-input audio - which might be re-purposable into 6-way surround sound outputs. A nice bonus would be a PS2 external keyboard/mouse socket, as running these through USB can leave something to be desired in terms of immediacy and accuracy.
* Again, good mouse options... and a good keyboard. Being large is all well and good, but it pays to be clever as well. Some 14 and 15" laptop manufacturers seem content to stuff in the cheapest one-size-fits-all (i.e. it's only as wide as a 12" one) keyboard and be done with it. Not good enough.
* Battery life is a bit of a moot point on these. A lot of them can't get more than 2 hours even with all the power saving features turned on, which is just about enough to boot up, watch a standard length DVD, and safely shut down just as the warning light starts to flash. Again, get what you can (every little helps, particularly if you're trying to finish re-editing the last paragraph of an important essay and then dump it onto your pendrive with only 5% juice remaining), but don't expect greatness.
---- for all this, you'll probably pay 3/4 the price of the ultraportable one..!

General stuff:
* Memory. Can't stress it enough. 512 of DDR main RAM is your minimum. More if you can at all afford it. The same rule holds true here as for about the last fifteen years of home computing: if you don't put enough memory in your computer, you may as well fetch the rest of the parts from landfill, as they won't make a blind bit of difference to the performance. It's a major bottleneck, and just gets worse as both operating systems and programs suffer that odd disease known as Creeping Featuritis.. and as they offer more "shiny things" and labour saving items, so their memory load increases :-)
* CPU speed isn't so important any more -- most days i find the machine trotting along happily at it's speedstep minimum of 800mhz no matter what i'm doing -- but a decent chip design IS, as it affects more ephemeral and rarely advertised, but actually quite important things like memory access speed, amount of max-speed "cache" memory, power consumption, available multimedia instruction sets and the like. Do not accept a Celeron (cut down pentium), or some rubbish (currently!) AMD shoe-in. Right now the only game in town worth playing is late-model Pentium-M (budget) or Core Solo/Duo (more expensive).
* DO NOT ACCEPT ANYTHING WITHOUT USB 2.0 PORTS OR WIRELESS INTERNET ... and really, don't accept anything with Wireless "b" type (11 megabit/sec). It'll work fine for internet, but a decent "g" or even "n" type is a lot better and more future proof (54mb/s and higher). If at all possible, make sure it has infra-red and/or bluetooth built in also. These are very handy for e.g. communicating with mobile phones to extract their tasty phone-cam juices and backup their addressbooks.
* Again, mouse replacements. USB mice are pretty awful things if you get them in the wrong socket (and with some chipsets, ALL of them are the wrong one), jumping about etc, and often now the old mainstay PS2 socket is rarely seen - so it's good to have a usable internal one. Hence looking for something with a stick and a pad... generally a pad is more intuitive and dependable, but some swear by the stick, and it can be quicker for some things... it's nice to have the choice. And a scroll wheel/button... :-) ((of course, a pen tablet screen is a third and interesting choice!))
* Really, check the keyboard. Some of them can be really spongy and horrid, or clacky, or far too thin for touch typing comfort (*shoots a poison glance at Sony Vaio*). There needs to be some travel and tactile feedback, and a good solid backboard, but not necessarily as much as as a standard desktop model (particularly travel-wise - a laptop keyboard may be less than 2mm, compared to about 5 for a desktop, saving three precious mm off the unit height with the lid down). Of course, this is not possible if you're ordering online, but I have my reservations with doing that for something like a laptop anyway.
* DVD drives... just like it got with CD writers, it's hard to pick a bad one. Just look for something which offers dual layer writing, and as many of it's functions supporting both "plus" and "minus" type DVDRs, and you'll be fine almost no matter what DVD or CD you put in.
* I'd get a memory stick / thumb drive / USB disc / whatever you want to call it at the same time, if you haven't got one. They're invaluable and really reduce your dependence on CDRs (or even floppies). Somewhere around 512 to 2gb is the sweet spot price wise right now, and 128 / 256mb ones are dirt cheap. McDonalds will probably be giving them away in happy meals next week.
* Thinking of brands for a moment... don't get too attached to any one or be affected by advertising. Apple may make a resurgence. Someone may start up out of nowhere and shock the market. Nothing's certain. Still, there's a few brands who are normally reputable (often a matter of opinion, though!)........... e.g. HP-Compaq (can't complain about the one i'm using now!), Toshiba (not high performance or classy, but solid), Acer (reliable budget models), IBM-Lenovo (traditionally the gold standard, with good reason), and recently Fujitsu and Samsung. I personally wouldn't want to use a Dell if i even got it for free, particularly after the exploding battery fiasco. Sony... there's too much of their business tied up in image these days, and taking stuff to unfeasible extremes, and the products suffer for it. A no-name brand will often be cheaper, and seem to offer a better spec, but be careful to scrutinise the hardware list against the bigger players, and see if they're cutting important corners anywhere then covering it up, e.g. a rubbish years-old video subsystem that will slow everything down whilst chowing lots of memory as it has none of it's own (remember: higher resolution = more memory needed.. typically these days horizontal x vertical pixels x 4 = minimum bytes required).
* LOOK FOR A DEAL!!!! If at all possible wait for the sales after christmas, unless it's a present for someone. DONT rush out and buy one on my or anyones reccomendations. Have a good look around, shop around online, find somewhere like PC World that looks like your typical messy, expensive retailer that in reality occasionally throws up a gem. Go online and use the points covered here as jump-offs to research stuff around the topic e.g. on google. It may take you a month in your spare time to come to a decision, it'll be a month well spent, not least because with every week your money can get you a slightly better computer without even needing to accrue interest.
* See what software you can get included! It's always a good thing to try for. My own deal was more hardware than software based, but getting office and something else thrown in would have actually been better as it's worth more than a DVD drive...

So to quickly run through the other more pointed... er, points...

* Microsoft office. You mentioned the crucial "homework" word. I don't know if this applies where you are, but in the UK they offer the Student and Teacher package ... you get Word, Excel, Powerpoint and Outlook 2003 editions, fully functional, for a knock down price (similar to or even slightly less than full-price Word sold seperately). Absolute bargain and very useful.

* Using internet for iTunes etc. Particularly as you're going to be tying money up in your downloading - and/or the temptation is there to go to less reputable sites and try your hand at getting it for fee - you'll want decent virus protection. DONT take the offer of getting Norton for a year cheap with the computer; better, kinder alternatives are available free online for home users... AVG and Avast! to name just two in the "A" section. Get an antivirus like these, get a software firewall, if you're using a wireless router to connect to the internet make sure it's hardware one is on. Gather a few anti-malware programs like Ad-Aware and Spybot Search and Destroy and make sure you also avail of their preventative options not just the after-the-fact ones. Literally, it's hard to be too careful. Also be sure to update windows regularly. I prefer to leave it set to "download automatically but update manually" - that way you can exercise a little more control over what's going on, refuse any updates that look suspicious, and not be ambushed by it trying to force an update at a clearly silly time, like when you're trying to shut down urgently.
This is also where the wireless internet, DVD burner and battery life bob up again - both very useful things. How about burning your own video, after downloading the backing track lounging on the couch and walking about the house?

* Camera pictures transfer - this is where an integrated card reader or USB 2.0 socket come into their own. Original digital cameras used a treacle slow serial link, which was never any good. USB 1.1 was a vast improvement, but still a bit sluggish for multi-megapixel cameras. USB2 rips along at an alarming pace, and transfer from a card reader is typically even faster, unless it's attached itself by usb... Also it's where your hard disc space comes in. Depending on your megapixels, memory card size, whether you take videos as well, and if you just take a few critical snapshots or are a complete shutterbug, your storage needs may vary. But it's always best to err on the side of BIGGER!

* By "types of memories" I will assume you mean between RAM and Hard Drive? Quick analogy session: If the computer is your office, RAM is your working area which has to be cleared off at the end of a day, and the Hard Disc is a big filing cabinet. You take stuff out of the cabinet, work on it, and put it away when you're done. Depending on the sizes of each, you (the computer) can store more or less, and work on more or less things simultaneously without needing to resort to stacking them up on the floor (using a coned-off part of the hard disc as "virtual memory" to expand working room at the expense of a lot of speed) and moving them on/off the desk as required. They're all much the same, differing only in size and speed, and not coming in a great deal of variety. The idea is basically to get as much and as high a speed as you can afford, concentrating on: memory size, disc speed, disc size, memory speed, in about that order. Though there's little to choose from speedwise - memory is all "double speed" (DDR) and runs at a few rather similar rates, discs are 4200, 5400 or 7200rpm for laptops, with a choice of quick ATA or super quick Serial ATA connection - so often size is the decider. 512mb is a huge amount of memory, at least by yesteryear standards (my first PC used a THOUSAND times less), but is sadly necessary for the massively capable, media-rich programs we now use. Disc storage can be thought of in terms of CDs (2/3rd gigabyte) or DVDs (4.3 / 7.9Gb) and is hard to express in metaphorical terms. 1gb will get you about 15 hours of music or an hour or two of video at current standards, if that makes it any easier - or a couple thousand fairly porky Word documents. Just aim for 40gb as a practical minimum for comfortable working (i.e. leaving no less than 10% free space).

* Different processors... think I already said enough here :-) The AMD and older / cheaper Intel chips are competent enough, and you probably wouldn't notice much difference for a couple years except for battery life and heat, but there's a price vs capability and efficiency tradeoff that's just not worth it right now. There's something of a shift going on from ever reaching for "faster" (higher mhz / ghz clock speed) and more power-hungry chips, to "massively parallel" (multiple cores - "virtual" chips in one package - at similar or lower speed) setups with impeccable green credentials... working smarter, not harder. Why stick in the mud?

* Optical drive types... OK....
CD - you know CD. It plays music up to 80 minutes. Holds data up to 700mb. Pre-written. Can be read at single speed, or all the way up to about 60x normal speed in the right drive (where centrifugal and vibrational effects start to get silly - as it's a fairly weak, flexible item spinning at about 15000rpm).
DVD - ditto. Data upto 4.3 or 7.9Gb depending on one/two layers. One to four hours playing time. Readable up to about 16x, as a regular DVD spins several times quicker than a CD.
CD-R ... a CD that can be written to "once"... you can write in steps, if you like, but nothing written can be altered, once it's there, it's fixed. Can be written at pretty high speeds, upto 48x normal audio playing speed under the right conditions (16 or 24x is more realistic - this is relative to 150kb/sec data, or real time playback speed).
CD-RW... a CD that can be written to multiple times, and optionally erased in-between. Particularly useful when "packet formatted" that allows you to use it like a 600mb-ish floppy disc (some space lost to the formatting). Usually not writeable as quick - 16x is the limit, 10x more realistic.
DVD-R... as before, a DVD that can be written to once. But there's added complication in the form of DVD+R... both are standards for writable discs put forward by rival companies that differ in some minute technical regard. It doesn't matter anyway, as most drives can read both (some, e.g. set-top players, prefer one or the other, and you normally only find this out by experimenting), and most modern writers can WRITE both, too. Write speeds can be all the way up to 16x (more reliably 6 or 8x), single layer only.
DVD-R DL ... (again, also in +R form) It took a crazy amount of time coming, but now dual-layer discs are writable as well. Speeds go up to 8x, but more often 4 or even just 2.4x, needing 40 minutes to fill one (5 minutes per Gb, slower than many CD writers), meaning you have to balance the need to get everything on one disc vs the time needed to do it. That and the reduced read-reliability of the discs - they're still a bit prototype, haven't really made it into home DVD recorders, and may be totally eclipsed by blu-ray writers.
DVD-RW ... Re-writable versions of the plus and minus discs exist too. I haven't ever used them myself.. there seems little call to, unless you're testing out e.g. a DVD menu system and dont want to waste loads of discs. Write speeds up to 8x if memory serves me correctly, and they were actually the FIRST writable DVD format - non-erasable ones came SECOND! Suffer similar but not as bad reduced reliability as dual layer, and are the main media for home DVD recorder devices. There is a variant called DVD-VR specifically for home recorders, which allows easier editing and time slipping or somesuch.

Any modern drive worth it's salt should support ALL of these, and at good speeds. Additionally it may support DVD-RAM, which is a lower capacity, lower speed but highly robust professional / mastering type rewritable format. e.g. my "free" bundle drive looks like it would be more at home shoring up a building, but supports 8x DVD+-R/RW writing, 4x +-DL writing, 3x RAM write, 48x CDR and 16x CDRW, plus 48x/16x read speeds. Just make sure they're all there, and you have nothing to worry about. It's good if a decent program such as Nero 7 is included for mastering and burning your discs; if not, it's definitely worth paying for, as it's good software, and effectively gets cheaper per disc each time you use make another project.

Final thought:
I can't reccomend any particular one to go for, you know your circumstances far better. If you can digest the litany above, go off for a virtual stroll around manufacturers websites and see what matches your criteria... new models come out all the time, and older ones (that were the new ones 3 - 6 months ago... your needs DONT typically change as fast as that unless you start a new job!) get steadily more affordable and accrue clearance deals to entice you to take them off the sellers hands at a near-loss.

AND ALWAYS CHECK THE FINE PRINT! :-)

What are the pros and cons between getting a laptop vs. a desktop?




! L O


If I have a budget of $1500 (u.s. dollars) would it be better if I get a laptop or a desktop


Answer
Because laptops nowdays contain the same stuff as desktops, n=buy yourself the best laptop you can. here are some pros and cons though.

Laptops
Pros:
Portability
Built in webcams (If you order them)
Wifi
umm...like I said, not to many differences except for these.

Cons:
smaller space to work in if you like to open you computer to mod it.
cannot be given quite as many extras as a desktop.(Lights, extra hard drives, ect.)

Destops
Pros:
Can hold more raw power if you actually need it.(You only need this kind of power if you are an EXTREME gamer and even many laptops are good for this. Check out alienware.)

Cons:
Not portable
drop it and it will habe a greater chance of being fatally broken.
Not as "cool"

So being as portability is the only real factors here- go with the laptop. I suggest a Macbook.( www.apple.com ) These don't crash, they are virus resistant, come with lots of extra good software for photos, movies, word processing, ect., and they are made VERY well.

Hope this helped! :-)




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Senin, 19 Agustus 2013

What are the specs I need to look out for when buying a portable hard drive? HELP REQUIRED...please!?

portable hard drive vs desktop on Home > Products > Asus > Monitors > Asus 23
portable hard drive vs desktop image



roaring_le


Like the minimum transfer rate...what does it have to be?
Should it have a fan?
Is USB more easier to use then Firewire?
What is the current maximum gb available for a portable hard drive?

and any other important thingd to look out for....

By the way I only need a portable hard drive because I am running out of space on my laptop and need some where else to store my videos, photos, music and word documents...but was wondering if I have a WMA file saved on my portable hard drive would it be as easy as 'plug and play' to play it back or would I need to transfer the files back on to my laptop hard drive to be able to watch, hear or see the file???

Thanks

p.s...Could you also tell me whether there are better quality and reputable brands then other when buying portable hard drives and does price really matter?



Answer
Hi there..

There is plenty of good brands available in the market nowadays and they are pretty good in quality and reliability. The question is now how much space do you need, the physical size of it ok for you and what sort of connector you're after. Price is relatively almost the same (if you are a good shopper/bargainer you might save some $$$) so remember to shop around first..

Size / capacity:
You may find harddrive size ranging from 160Gb up to 600Gb these days maybe more. It is up to you which one to get. Too small is not enough, too big you might lose too much data when it fails. Between 250 and 400 is perfect and recommended, and you can easily buy another one in the future as required.

Physical size & fans?
Two types: 2.5" and 3.5". The first one is usually used by laptops and can be converted into a portable one. It will cost you a bit less since all you need is to get a smaller and cheaper enclosure box to put the drive in. It uses usb2 and no fancy fans so it's cheap. 3.5" drives are commonly available in store, dimension is almost four times as big. Enclosures for this normally have a built-in fan which requires external power. If you would leave the drive plugged in and running all the time, the one with fan is recommended, otherwise 2.5" hdd would be ideal.

USB vs Firewire:
Definitely go for usb but make sure it is version 2 (usb2) as it offers faster transfer rate and it's more commonly used and available in newer laptops and desktops. They are the same when it comes to ease of use. There is also another type of connection available which allows you to share with other users in your place by plugging it into your home router (uses RJ45/ethernet).

Regardless of the types, portable drives can be accessed as easy as an internal ones. Plug it in, wait few seconds to get it recognised...all yours. Accessing documents, viewing photos or playing music and videos (all types) shouldn't be an issue since it is logically treated as an internal drive. However when disconnecting, if you have other than XP make sure you first remove it from the system before unplugging the cable to prevent damaging the actual device.

heh...hope this helps...

What is better to buy in a computer...a desktop or a laptop?




paul y


I have had desk tops but I am unsure of a lap top...are they safe?
are they easily broken? i never used a lap top so i have not a clue



Answer
Desktops vs Laptops is a long running debate, but here are some pointers that may help. Laptops benefit from being smaller and more portable obviously, and if you want to use your machine on the go, a laptop is probably a good choice. Desktops are usually bulkier and take up more space, plus it's kinda impractical to move them around too much. However, upgrading a laptop is not easy. They only usually have space for one hard disk, so if you run out of storage space you will have to replace the whole drive, whereas with a PC you can install an extra one. Also, if you want to upgrade the processor in say six months time, you may find that it's not possible, whereas with a PC (provided its a fairly generic manufacturer), you can simply rip out the main board and fit a different one. Having said all that, I would always go for a desktop for one really big reason. If your monitor blows up on your desktop, you can simply buy a new one, which may cost you between £50 - £250 depending on how good and big it is. If you crack your laptop screen, quite often the cost of replacement is more expensive than the current value of the laptop. Sure you can plug in an external screen, but that defeats the purpose. Laptops are more likely to get damaged as well, simply by virtue of the fact you are carrying them around and moving them. In short, a laptop is less upgradable, more fragile and more expensive in general to repair, but, is the more portable solution. Oh, and as for security, the security of the machine is down to how you set up the software there isn't really a difference between desktops and laptops, as if someone is determined enough, they will get in no matter what you have. Hope that helps :) IT@Tonicweb.co.uk




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Kamis, 25 Juli 2013

What is a good price for this Mac, and Macbook Pro vs. Macbook Air?

portable hard drive vs desktop on Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1TB vs Transcend StoreJet 25M3
portable hard drive vs desktop image



Dayna


So I have a Macbook Pro, but I'm getting some money and looking to upgrade.
Here's what I have:
13" Mid 2010
2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor
8GB 1067 MHz DDR3 RAM
NVIDIA GeForce 320M 256 MB graphics
and I have mountain lion, office mac, and iphoto, i movie, and garageband.
250GB hard drive
So I bought this Macbook about a year ago for $700, what's it worth now?

Second question: Should I upgrade to the Macbook Pro retina, brand new macbook air, or keep mine?
It bugs me that I cant watch 1080p video, so the idea of a nicer display really appeals to me. The macbook air doesnt play 1080p, but it is slightly better than my current resolution.
The other reason I want to upgrade is that i have intel core 2 duo and I'd like i5 or i7. I play games on my macbook and for the most part they run great, but it could be better.

Lastly: this december I'm joining the Air Force and I'd like a portable macbook that's gonna be updated and reliable for a long time. I just want to buy the newest one and not worry about upgrading for a while, if you get what I mean. I also want a long battery life, and a decent amount of RAM.

It's so tough because I want the nice display, fast graphics, along with RAM and a good battery life. Portability isn't a problem with either though, their both so small.

Please don't recommend anything other than Apple products. I hate windows with a passion and samsung too. i realize they make good products but im just not a fan. Thanks guys!
I forgot to add my main uses for it are:
Email
TONS of web surfing, often with many tabs and tons of downloading
Gaming, but light games. nothing super intense. (minecraft)
Streaming video (in HD whenever possible) from youtube & netflix
typing essays/papers/email (not much, as i graduate very soon)
@Doro I definitely agree that OSX is a dumbed down Linux, but I like it that way. I'm mostly an apple fan because their stuff is sooo reliable and I cloud all my crap with my phone so easy. Plus, before the disaster that is windows 8, I had a toshiba laptop with windows.....wait for it......VISTA. You can kinda see my hate now right? And I definitely can't afford a $3,000 laptop, but after selling my current macbook (maybe $600) Ill only have to pay about $800 to get the lower 13" macbook retina. The macbook air would only cost about $500 more. (i have the education discount)

I have a job that pays $10 an hour and nothing to spend it on besides gas.



Answer
Apple fanboy, huh?
I agree with Windows being crap. The only justifiable reason for Windows is hard core gaming.
Period.

Mac OSX is in fact just a dumbed down version of Linux for Dummies (NO OFFENSE).
Tried it, never liked it. Linux is sooo much better.
Ever tried Linux?

Look at my cool Linux desktop, looks better than a Mac and is faster, safer and 100% free (the OS and any software or app I ever need):
http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk177/Doruletzul/MintSystemInfo_zps4cb5ba27.png
http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/kk177/Doruletzul/Screenshot-8_zps614e2a3d.png

As far as your question, both Retina and non-Retina 13inch models of Macbook Pro under $1,700 only have integrated Intel HD graphics, I hope you know that...
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_mac/family/macbook_pro
Only the 15inch models have a graphics card, the $1,800 non-Retina and the $2,200 and $2,800 Retina models.
The Air Force mus be paying pretty good nowadays, if you can afford to spend up to $3,000 on a laptop....

Last, but not least, even a cheap $300 laptop with integrated Intel HD graphics can play 1080p streaming video (Youtube, Netflix, HULU Plus, etc).
I know mine does, and I paid $280 for it at Walmart + another $50 after market, to upgrade RAM from 2GB to 8GB.
Wiped of Windows 7 as soon as I got home and installed Linux. It runs like a dream.

Don't bother paying for a Netflix subscription. As soon as you ship overseas, you won't be able to use it anymore, unless the Air Force somehow provides you a US registered IP for Internet connection.

What are the specs I need to look out for when buying a portable hard drive? HELP REQUIRED...please!?




roaring_le


Like the minimum transfer rate...what does it have to be?
Should it have a fan?
Is USB more easier to use then Firewire?
What is the current maximum gb available for a portable hard drive?

and any other important thingd to look out for....

By the way I only need a portable hard drive because I am running out of space on my laptop and need some where else to store my videos, photos, music and word documents...but was wondering if I have a WMA file saved on my portable hard drive would it be as easy as 'plug and play' to play it back or would I need to transfer the files back on to my laptop hard drive to be able to watch, hear or see the file???

Thanks

p.s...Could you also tell me whether there are better quality and reputable brands then other when buying portable hard drives and does price really matter?



Answer
Hi there..

There is plenty of good brands available in the market nowadays and they are pretty good in quality and reliability. The question is now how much space do you need, the physical size of it ok for you and what sort of connector you're after. Price is relatively almost the same (if you are a good shopper/bargainer you might save some $$$) so remember to shop around first..

Size / capacity:
You may find harddrive size ranging from 160Gb up to 600Gb these days maybe more. It is up to you which one to get. Too small is not enough, too big you might lose too much data when it fails. Between 250 and 400 is perfect and recommended, and you can easily buy another one in the future as required.

Physical size & fans?
Two types: 2.5" and 3.5". The first one is usually used by laptops and can be converted into a portable one. It will cost you a bit less since all you need is to get a smaller and cheaper enclosure box to put the drive in. It uses usb2 and no fancy fans so it's cheap. 3.5" drives are commonly available in store, dimension is almost four times as big. Enclosures for this normally have a built-in fan which requires external power. If you would leave the drive plugged in and running all the time, the one with fan is recommended, otherwise 2.5" hdd would be ideal.

USB vs Firewire:
Definitely go for usb but make sure it is version 2 (usb2) as it offers faster transfer rate and it's more commonly used and available in newer laptops and desktops. They are the same when it comes to ease of use. There is also another type of connection available which allows you to share with other users in your place by plugging it into your home router (uses RJ45/ethernet).

Regardless of the types, portable drives can be accessed as easy as an internal ones. Plug it in, wait few seconds to get it recognised...all yours. Accessing documents, viewing photos or playing music and videos (all types) shouldn't be an issue since it is logically treated as an internal drive. However when disconnecting, if you have other than XP make sure you first remove it from the system before unplugging the cable to prevent damaging the actual device.

heh...hope this helps...




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Minggu, 21 Juli 2013

Which is a better purchase in the long run?

portable hard drive vs desktop on nas hard may called platters which are its internal hard
portable hard drive vs desktop image



Joshua


Computer or laptop? Please list reasons, thank you.


Answer
both are computers. a computer is laptop is the same thing
i think you meant desktop vs laptop

desktop is better in the long run, especially fi it's BYOS (build your own system) .
because there's alot of 10 to 20 year old desktops in existence, although obsolete now is still in working condition. you don't see ANy laptops more than 5 years old still working. unless its ibm.

desktop:
1, expandable, upgradable
2, customizable
3, better thermal dissipation- things run cooler
4, less likely to be damaged by soda or dropped, etc
5, if BYOS you can build it to last 10 years no problem. mine has a design life to 2019 (10 years).
6, easily upgraded.modified to keep up-to-date with latest trends. like extra memory, new hard drives, new OS, etc.
7, if anything broke it's easy & inexpensive to repair/replace.

laptop:
1, one set of hardware. if you need new hardware too bad.
2, only ram cna be expanded, and usually only ot 8 GB
3, use it or loose it, it'll only last about 5 years. if you used the heck out of it or used it light and maintained it well, it'll only last 5 years
4, batteries may die, a recurring expense.
5, no upgrading options you can't even do a hard drive swap with many laptops due to the amount of special drivers, software, etc.
6, since it's portable it has the high chance of getting coffee spilt on or knocked off a table.
7, if anything broke after 1 year of ownership it's out of pocket to repair or you have ot buy a new one.

basically values break down:
laptop: $1500, 3 years. worth $500/year
recurring cost, in 10 years you'll have bought 3 laptops each costing $1500 each. ($4500)

desktop (assuming BYOS) $1500, 10 years. cost is $150/year.
in 10 years, you've only spent $1500.

basically for laptop- convenience of taking it everywhere, you're losing on hardware options, power, capacity, use, no expansion, no upgrades, suck with special hardware/software only available thru OEM software, ease of self repair options. you trade all these away for mobility at roughly 3X increased cost over a period of time, say 10 years.
is it worth it? perhaps not.
the only reason to get a laptop is to have portable computing, it will not game, it will not workstation, the screen's too small for multi media, it's primary use is mobile computing that's all. best value is always attained with desktops.

Graphic design student...What are some lap top recommendations?




San Jose M


I have a desktop computer with dual monitors that I share with my husband. It works great, is super fast, and is just right for school stuff.
However, I want a lap top that can handle Photoshop as well as some other design programs.

My current laptop is at least 8 years old and is on its last leg. I can't watch videos, scroll through pictures or do multiple tasks at once on it. Those are all things I'd like with a new laptop.

What would you recommend? What do you use?



Answer
Hey San Jose Mommy. I'm a San Jose Grandpa!

I have seen this "graphic design laptop" question many times on Yahoo Answers, and I consistantly respond that there ARE no good laptops for this purposes. Mainly, it is an issue with the size of the monitor, which makes good design paifully difficult. Unless you are designing a final product that is smaller than your monitor, it is hard to work to such a small surface. It is true, that not all graphic design projects are even as small as the largest monitor, but it is simply human nature to do artwork on as large a surface as possible.

All right. Having said this, and, with the recognition that many people, particulary design students, don't really have the option of running both a desktop design station, AND having to carry a laptop for school, the only advice I can offer is that you make sure that the portable system has the most ram, fastest processor and largest hard drive you can afford. Graphics apps keep growing and get more resource hungry with every upgrade. So, get as much raw power as you can, now, to minimize the chance of going obsolete too soon.

Stick with the name brands and, run the same platform as the system at home. I won't get into the Mac vs. PC argument, except to say that I run both types in my studio. THEY WORK THE SAME! But, keep your desktop and your laptop using the same, basic platform. It will make sharing files and peripherals much easier.

Stick with the name brands.

P.S. I don't use a laptop exept for journaling while on road trips and to store photos when my flash cards get full.

Is it going to cool of much more this next week? I like warm weather, but I'm looking forward to the autumn colors.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers